Article

$400 million Medicaid savings could have huge impact on schools

A new report by Innovation Ohio shows that the $400 million in Medicaid expansion savings could have a dramatic impact on schools.

An analysis by Innovation Ohio shows Sen. Widener’s claim to be demonstrably false. To the contrary, the impact of an extra $400 million on Ohio schools would be dramatic and profound. Specifically:
  • $400 million exceeds the total amount spent by the state on economically disadvantaged aid ($369 million)
  • $400 million is over 6 times more than what the state spends on K-3 literacy ($64 million)

  • $400 million is more than what the state spends on the Third-Grade Reading Guarantee, Gifted Education, Career Tech Education, Limited English Proficiency Education and half of the state's six Special Education categories ($399.7 million).

  • $400 million exceeds the entire amount spent by the state on school transportation ($357 million).

  • Indeed, the only education line items on which the state spends more than $400 million are Charter Schools, the state’s basic aid amount, targeted assistance (parity aid) and Special Education. Everything else gets less money.

What could the state do if it spent the $400 million on our schools?

  • Double funding for Gifted, ELL, Career Tech and K-3 literacy funding.
  • Double funding for Transportation – while also nearly doubling funding for the Third-Grade Reading Guarantee.

  • Double the amount of economically disadvantaged funding.

  • Pay for All-Day Kindergarten or universal preschool in our most economically distressed areas

  • Triple the funding for the most profoundly challenged special needs children in the state


The report goes on to also note that rather than a measly $28 a year in income tax savings that a typical tax payer might receive, distributing an extra $400 million to Ohio school districts could also result in dramatic property tax reductions. The average district would receive the equivalent of 2.29 mills in property taxes – or about $80 per $100,000 home – if $400 million in new state money were distributed among districts.

Read the entire report below

THE IMPACT OF $400 MILLION ON OHIO SCHOOLS

Teacher Evaluations - Upon Further Review?

It seems the Rube Goldberg system of teacher evaluations in Ohio might be getting some improvements. We have written extensively about the unfairness of basing so much of a teachers evaluation on Value-add, when it is subject to so much statistical variation, inaccuracies, and student demographics. In the recent budget, educators pressed the legislature to reduce the Value-add component form its current 50% to 35%. The Senate included language to do just that, but the House, under direction from the Governor stripped it out.

Now Senator Gardner, along wth 3 cosponsors, Manning, Lehner, and Hite has introduced SB 229 which once again seeks to make OTES fairer. Along with making OTES a little fairer, it also seeks to reduce the administratvie burden on distrcits by reducing the amount of observation required for "skilled" and "accomplished" teachers. We wrote about this massive burden over 2 years ago.

HEre's what SB229 contains

  • Lowers the academic growth factor percentage required on teacher evaluations to 35% from the current 50%. A school district may attribute an additional percentage to the academic growth factor not to exceed fifteen percent of an evaluation. The academic growth factor under the OTES is based on value-added and/or other student growth measures, depending on the subjects and grades in a teacher’s course load.
  • Authorizes local school boards to reduce the frequency of evaluations required for teachers who receive an evaluation rating of “Skilled” to once every 2 years and “Accomplished” once every 3 years.

Educators should contact their representatives and urge them to support SB229, otherwsie it is possible that the Governor will once again kill these needed changes. You can read the bill for yourself, here.

What’s it like to be an educator in a so-called right to Work state?

We were reading through the latest issue of Ohio Schools Magainze, and came upon this terrific article by a retired teacher, on her experiences working in a right to work state. Here’s that article.

OEA-Retired Member Dawn Wojcik Offers Insight About Why These Laws Are Harmful And What To Expect If They Are Enacted In Ohio.

In 1981, when Dawn wojcik began her teaching career, Ohio’s economy was faltering. As a recent graduate from the University of Dayton with a Masters degree and teaching credentials, she applied for every English teacher opening in the state. She was the Avis candidate—trying harder, yet coming in second place in the 10 positions for which she interviewed.

As the school year started, she found herself living at home with her parents and looking forward to subbing until something better turned up.

A week into the school year, Wojcik received a phone call from the personnel director for the Franklin Parish Schools in Louisiana. The parish (county) needed a ninth-grade English teacher at Morgan City High School. Wojcik was hired over the phone based solely on her resume and transcripts.

She was excited at the prospect of her first teaching position, but unprepared for the realities of working as an educator in a so-called Right to Work state.

Wojcik soon learned that despite the name, Right to Work laws limit rights, meaning that educators have less power to advocate for student learning conditions and educator working conditions.

Public education takes a hit in SCRTW states as teachers move to other states with lower class sizes, better salaries and benefits, and more job security. School funding suffers, too. States with Right to Work laws spend $3,392 less per pupil on elementary and secondary education. And without the ability to bargain for better teaching and learning conditions, academic achievement declines. The majority of states with SCRTW laws are among the lowest performing in the nation.

“There was a shortage of teachers in Louisiana’s “oil parishes.” I was thrilled to have a job, especially one with a beginning salary of $15,100 a year $400 more a year than the best paying position I had applied for in Ohio. These higher salaries were possible because of taxes on the oil drilled in the parish. Teachers had not bargained these salaries. It was the luck of being in an “oil parish” that provided the resources for these salaries. Salaries throughout the rest of the state were much lower.

My first day on the job, I received grammar and literature textbooks. I asked my department chair where I should start. She thumped her arthritic finger into her desk and, in a southern drawl, said, “I always start with the verb” as she glared at me from her desk. I never received any additional direction from her.

There was no effort to mentor new teachers. We were our own to do the best we could without guidance or support. After a few months in the classroom, I received some instruction on how to write lesson plans. I learned that I was to identify Pupil Performance Objectives in my lesson plans. All teachers were to be teaching to these same standardized objectives. These objectives were to be on my desk and available for administrators to see at all times.

I didn’t realize how important being a part of the education association was until I worked as a professional at Northmont. In Louisiana, the limited role I had in the education profession was directly related to legal limitations on bargaining and educators’ ability to organize. My first three years as a teacher, I was left to sink or swim as an employee. because of collective bargaining in ohio, I was actively involved as an education professional for 27 years.
Dawn Wojcik, Retired Teacher

Here was no support for teachers, no mentors, no professional development. And there was no mechanism for teachers to have input for our profession.

As money tightened up, there was talk that franklin Parish would increase class sizes and close some of its schools. My colleagues were upset. Talk in the workrooms encouraged us all to go to the school board meeting. enough teachers showed up to pack the boardroom. But no one spoke up with our concerns.

After listening at the school board meeting, the self-appointed leaders determined that there was nothing we could do short of a statewide strike. They concluded that even that action would be fruitless. As we faced this financial crisis, we had no avenue to communicate our students’ needs to those who made the decisions about the learning conditions for our students. It was discouraging to not have a voice. Working in a No Rights at Work state made us powerlessness in this situation.

My $15,100 Louisiana starting salary had impressed me until I had some time to study the salary schedule.

It was then that I saw a different story. While my starting salary was higher in Louisiana than in Ohio, even with a Ph.D. and 30 plus years of experience, the top of the salary schedule would be no more than $22,000.

During my second year in Louisiana, I began applying for jobs in Ohio. I was fortunate that by the end of my third year, Northmont City Schools hired me, and I returned home to Ohio in 1984 to teach at Northmont high School.

At the time I was hired, the Northmont District education Association (NDeA) was preparing to take a strike vote. The local leader- ship took time to meet new teachers, patiently answering our questions about the bargaining crisis. I joined in order to have a vote. We voted to give a 10-day strike notice, an action that brought the parties back to the table and resulted in significant improvements in the contract.

With the new Northmont contract, I would be making nearly $4,000 more a year than I had been after three years in Louisiana. I had better medical insurance and vision and dental coverage. Not only were the financial rewards of returning to my home state significantly better but also, because of the leadership of my local, I was welcomed as a new teacher. Other teachers shared their lesson plans and materials. The school district offered professional development throughout the year. Our collective bargaining agreement called for a labor management team that met regularly to share concerns through- out the district. Our NDeA held a district-wide Monte Carlo event to raise money for student scholarships to summer enrichment programs and college.

I worked for 27 years at Northmont high School and was always treated like a professional. This was a huge contrast to the experience I had at Morgan City high School in Louisiana, a so-called Right to Work (or as I say, a No Rights at Work) state.

Recently, I checked to see what I would have earned at the end of my career in Louisiana and what that would have meant for my retirement income. had I stayed in Louisiana, my retirement would be about one third less than what it is now.

November 2013 School Levy Results

The 2013 school levies saw a small uptick in their passage rates compared to 2012.

N/R Failed Passed Pass %
New 71 38 34.9%
Renewal 6 78 92.9%
Total 77 116 60.1%

As is the normal pattern, renewals were overwhelmingly passed, but requests for additional funds to make up for state cuts proved harder to pass. Perhaps the most notable failure was that of the Columbus City schools. While this is a disappointing result, it is clear that voters are simply not keen on sending more dollars to charter schools. We don't expect the district to offer a levy with this kind of provision again, any time soon.

Here's the full list of unofficial results

County District Type N/R Result
Allen Bath LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Allen Elida LSD Levy New Failed
Allen Perry LSD Combination New Passed
Allen Shawnee LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Ashland Hillsdale LSD Income Tax New Passed
Ashland Loudonville-Perrysville EVSD Levy Renewal Failed
Ashtabula Geneva Area CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Ashtabula Jefferson Area LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Athens Trimble LSD Levy New Failed
Auglaize Minster LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Auglaize New Bremen LSD Combination New Failed
Auglaize New Knoxville LSD Income Tax Renewal Passed
Belmont Bellaire LSD Levy New Failed
Belmont Shadyside LSD Levy New Passed
Brown Ripley Union Huntington LSD Levy New Failed
Butler Fairfield CSD Combination New Failed
Butler Lakota LSD Levy New Passed
Butler Middletown CSD Combination New Failed
Carroll Carrollton EVSD Levy New Failed
Champaign Graham LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Champaign Mechanicsburg EVSD Levy Renewal Passed
Champaign Triad LSD Income Tax New Failed
Champaign Triad LSD Income Tax Renewal Passed
Champaign Urbana CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Clark Clark-Shawnee LSD Levy New Failed
Clark Northeastern LSD Income Tax New Failed
Clark Tecumseh LSD Levy New Failed
Clermont West Clermont LSD Levy New Failed
Clermont Williamsburg LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Clinton Clinton-Massie LSD Income Tax New Failed
Columbiana Columbiana EVSD Bond New Failed
Columbiana United LSD Levy New Failed
Coshocton Coshocton County JVSD Levy New Failed
Coshocton Coshocton CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Crawford Colonel Crawford LSD Levy New Failed
Crawford Colonel Crawford LSD Bond New Failed
Crawford Galion CSD Levy New Failed
Cuyahoga Brecksville-Broadview Heights CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Cuyahoga Brooklyn CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Cuyahoga Cleveland Hts.-University Hts. CSD Bond New Passed
Cuyahoga Independence LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Cuyahoga Lakewood CSD Combination New Passed
Cuyahoga North Royalton CSD Bond New Failed
Cuyahoga Olmsted Falls CSD Bond New Failed
Cuyahoga Solon CSD Levy New Passed
Cuyahoga Westlake CSD Levy New Failed
Defiance Ayersville LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Defiance Northeastern LSD Levy New Passed
Erie EHOVE JVSD Levy Renewal Passed
Erie Huron CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Erie Perkins LSD Levy New Failed
Fairfield Berne Union LSD Income Tax Renewal Failed
Fairfield Bloom Carroll LSD Combination New Failed
Franklin Columbus CSD Combination New Failed
Franklin Columbus CSD Misc New Failed
Franklin Upper Arlington CSD Levy New Passed
Fulton Evergreen LSD Income Tax Renewal Passed
Geauga Berkshire LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Geauga Chardon LSD Levy New Passed
Geauga Ledgemont LSD Combination New Failed
Geauga Newbury LSD Levy New Failed
Greene Beavercreek CSD Levy New Failed
Greene Yellow Springs EVSD Levy Renewal Passed
Guernsey East Guernsey LSD Levy New Failed
Hamilton Deer Park Community CSD Levy New Passed
Hamilton Oak Hills LSD Levy New Passed
Hamilton Three Rivers LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Hancock Arlington LSD Combination New
Hancock Liberty-Benton LSD Combination New Failed
Hancock Riverdale LSD Income Tax Renewal Passed
Hancock Van Buren LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Hardin Upper Scioto Valley LSD Levy New Failed
Henry Holgate LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Henry Holgate LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Henry Napoleon Area CSD Levy New Passed
Huron Monroeville LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Huron Norwalk CSD Income Tax Renewal Failed
Jefferson Edison LSD Levy New Failed
Jefferson Jefferson Co JVSD Levy New Passed
Knox East Knox LSD Combination New Failed
Knox Mount Vernon CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Lake Fairport Harbor EVSD Levy Renewal Passed
Lake Madison LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Lake Willoughby-Eastlake CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Licking Granville EVSD Levy New Passed
Licking Heath CSD Levy New Passed
Licking Newark CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Licking North Fork LSD Income Tax Renewal Passed
Licking Southwest Licking LSD Bond New Failed
Logan Benjamin Logan LSD Levy New Failed
Logan Indian Lake LSD Levy Renewal Failed
Logan Riverside LSD Income Tax Renewal Passed
Lorain Avon LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Lorain Columbia LSD Levy New Passed
Lorain Elyria CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Lorain Lorain County Community College Levy Renewal Passed
Lorain North Ridgeville CSD Combination New Passed
Lucas Anthony Wayne LSD Levy New Failed
Lucas Ottawa Hills LSD Levy New Passed
Lucas Springfield LSD Levy New Failed
Lucas Toledo CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Madison Madison-Plains LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Mahoning Canfield LSD Levy New Passed
Mahoning Sebring LSD Levy New Failed
Mahoning South Range LSD Levy New Failed
Mahoning West Branch LSD Income Tax New Failed
Marion Pleasant LSD Levy New Failed
Marion Ridgedale LSD Combination New Failed
Marion Tri-Rivers JVSD Levy Renewal Failed
Medina Brunswick LSD Levy New Failed
Medina Cloverleaf LSD Levy New Failed
Medina Medina CSD Levy New Passed
Meigs Southern LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Miami Troy CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Monroe Switzerland of Ohio LSD Levy New Failed
Montgomery Brookville LSD Levy New Failed
Montgomery Centerville CSD Levy New Passed
Montgomery Huber Heights CSD Levy New Failed
Montgomery Jefferson Twp LSD Levy Renewal Failed
Montgomery Kettering CSD Levy New Passed
Montgomery Oakwood CSD Levy New Passed
Montgomery Vandalia-Butler CSD Levy New Passed
Morrow Cardington-Lincoln LSD Income Tax New Passed
Morrow Mt. Gilead EVSD Income Tax New Failed
Morrow Northmor LSD Levy New Failed
Muskingum Franklin LSD Levy New Failed
Ottawa Benton-Carroll-Salem LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Ottawa Benton-Carroll-Salem LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Ottawa Port Clinton CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Paulding Paulding EVSD Levy Renewal Passed
Perry Southern LSD Levy New Failed
Pickaway Logan Elm LSD Combination New Passed
Portage Field LSD Levy New Failed
Portage James A. Garfield LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Portage Ravenna CSD Levy New Failed
Portage Streetsboro CSD Combination New Passed
Portage Windham EVSD Levy Renewal Passed
Preble Eaton Community CSD Income Tax Renewal Passed
Preble Tri-County North LSD Income Tax New Failed
Preble Twin Valley LSD Income Tax New Passed
Putnam Continental LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Putnam Leipsic LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Richland Mansfield CSD Levy New Passed
Sandusky Gibsonburg EVSD Income Tax New Passed
Sandusky Woodmore LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Scioto Scioto Co. Career Technical Center Levy Renewal Passed
Seneca Bettsville LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Seneca Old Fort LSD Income Tax Renewal Passed
Shelby Sidney CSD Income Tax New Failed
Stark Canton LSD Bond New Passed
Stark Fairless LSD Levy New Failed
Stark Marlington LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Stark Massillon CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Stark Osnaburg LSD Levy New Failed
Stark Perry LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Summit Manchester LSD Levy New Passed
Summit Mogadore LSD Levy New Failed
Summit Norton CSD Bond New Passed
Summit Tallmadge CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Summit Twinsburg CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Trumbull Bristol LSD Combination New Failed
Trumbull Howland LSD Levy New Failed
Trumbull LaBrae LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Trumbull Lordstown LSD Levy New Failed
Trumbull Maplewood LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Trumbull Mathews LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Trumbull Mathews LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Trumbull Southington LSD Levy New Failed
Trumbull Warren CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Trumbull Weathersfield LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Tuscarawas Buckeye JVSD Levy Renewal Passed
Tuscarawas Garaway LSD Combination New Failed
Tuscarawas Indian Valley LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Tuscarawas New Philadelphia CSD Levy New Failed
Tuscarawas Tuscarawas Valley LSD Levy New Failed
Union Fairbanks LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Union Marysville EVSD Levy Renewal Passed
Van Wert Crestview LSD Income Tax Renewal Passed
Van Wert Lincolnview LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Warren Franklin CSD Levy New Failed
Warren Lebanon CSD Combination New Passed
Warren Springboro Community CSD Levy Renewal Passed
Warren Wayne LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Washington Frontier LSD Levy New Failed
Wayne Northwestern LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Wayne Norwayne LSD Income Tax New Passed
Williams Bryan CSD Bond New Passed
Williams Millcreek-West Unity LSD Levy New Passed
Wood Eastwood LSD Levy Renewal Passed
Wood Elmwood LSD Income Tax Renewal Passed
Wood Elmwood LSD Income Tax Renewal Passed
Wood Northwood LSD Combination New Failed
Wood Rossford EVSD Bond New Failed
Wyandot Upper Sandusky EVSD Income Tax Renewal Passed


The Legislative Attack on American Workers

From the Economic Policy Institute

Over the past two years, state legislators across the country have launched an unprecedented series of initiatives aimed at lowering labor standards, weakening unions, and eroding workplace protections for both union and non-union workers. This policy agenda undercuts the ability of low- and middle-wage workers, both union and non-union, to earn a decent wage.

This report provides a broad overview of the attack on wages, labor standards, and workplace protections as it has been advanced in state legislatures across the country. Specifically, the report seeks to illuminate the agenda to undermine wages and labor standards being advanced for non-union Americans in order to understand how this fits with the far better-publicized assaults on the rights of unionized employees. By documenting the similarities in how analogous bills have been advanced in multiple states, the report establishes the extent to which legislation emanates not from state officials responding to local economic conditions, but from an economic and policy agenda fueled by national corporate lobbies that aim to lower wages and labor standards across the country.

In 2011 and 2012, state legislatures undertook numerous efforts to undermine wages and labor standards:
  • Four states passed laws restricting the minimum wage, four lifted restrictions on child labor, and 16 imposed new limits on benefits for the unemployed.
  • States also passed laws stripping workers of overtime rights, repealing or restricting rights to sick leave, undermining workplace safety protections, and making it harder to sue one’s employer for race or sex discrimination.
  • Legislation has been pursued making it harder for employees to recover unpaid wages (i.e., wage theft) and banning local cities and counties from establishing minimum wages or rights to sick leave.
  • For the 93 percent of private-sector employees who have no union contract, laws on matters such as wages and sick time define employment standards and rights on the job. Thus, this agenda to undermine wages and working conditions is aimed primarily at non-union, private-sector employees.

These efforts provide important context for the much-better-publicized moves to undermine public employee unions. By far the most galvanizing and most widely reported legislative battle of the past two years was Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s “budget repair bill” that, in early 2011, largely eliminated collective bargaining rights for the state’s 175,000 public employees.1 Following this, in 2011 and 2012:

  • Fifteen states passed laws restricting public employees’ collective bargaining rights or ability to collect “fair share” dues through payroll deductions.
  • Nineteen states introduced “right-to-work” bills, and “right-to-work” laws affecting private-sector collective bargaining agreements were enacted in Michigan and Indiana.

The champions of anti-union legislation often portrayed themselves as the defenders of non-union workers—whom they characterized as hard-working private-sector taxpayers being forced to pick up the tab for public employees’ lavish pay and pensions. Two years later, however, it is clear that the attack on public employee unions has been part of a broader agenda aiming to cut wages and benefits and erode working conditions and legal protections for all workers—whether union or non-union, in the public and private sectors alike.

This push to erode labor standards, undercut wages, and undermine unions has been advanced by policymakers pursuing a misguided economic agenda working in tandem with the major corporate lobbies. The report highlights legislation authored or supported by major corporate lobbies such as the Chamber of Commerce, National Federation of Independent Business, and National Association of Manufacturers—and by corporate-funded lobbying organizations such as the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), Americans for Tax Reform, and Americans for Prosperity—in order to draw the clearest possible picture of the legislative and economic policy agenda of the country’s most powerful economic actors. To make the most clear-eyed decisions in charting future policy directions, it is critical to understand how the various parts of these organizations’ agenda fit together, and where they ultimately lead.

This report begins by examining the recent offensive aimed at public-sector unions in order to point out the tactics commonly employed by corporate lobbies such as ALEC and the Chamber of Commerce; it establishes that their agenda is driven by political strategies rather than fiscal necessities. The paper then examines the details of this agenda with respect to unionized public employees, non-unionized public employees, and unionized private-sector workers. Finally, the bulk of the report details the corporate-backed agenda for non-union, private-sector workers as concerns the minimum wage, wage theft, child labor, overtime, misclassification of employees as independent contractors, sick leave, workplace safety standards, meal breaks, employment discrimination, and unemployment insurance.

Click here to read the whole report.

Broad Foundation just another anti-tax outfit

Eli Board, the billionaire backer of the corporate eduction reform organization The Board Foundation, likes to pretend he and his foundation are non partisan and simply doing best by students. It's never been a very credible claim, but now any shred of doubt has been stripped away by reports that he secretly funded anti-union, anti-tax efforts in California

A state investigation into a network of nonprofit groups that funneled $11 million into initiative campaigns in California last year has revealed the identities of dozens of previously hidden donors to the various organizations.

Those contributors include owners of the Gap Inc., for which California First Lady Anne Gust Brown was once a top executive, investor Charles Schwab and Los Angeles philanthropist Eli Broad. The groups they donated to gave money to other organizations, which gave to the campaigns.

One of the campaigns was an effort to derail a 2012 tax measure pushed by Gov. Jerry Brown -- which Broad had said he supported. The other supported a separate initiative that would have limited the power of labor unions to raise political cash.

Just like StudentsFirst, the Board Foundation shows that it isn't about education reform at all, but rather, just another anti-tax effort funded by a billionaire.