Campaign 2012 Election Live Blog

12:09 p.m.
We're closing down the live blog. We'll be bringing all the relevant election results tomorrow, ahem, later today, - school levies, state board of ed, state legislature.

11:27 p.m.
Obama projected to win NV

11:27 p.m.
Incumbent house GOPers appear to have lost: Craig Newbold in HD5 to challenger Nick Barborak 50.44% to 49.56% and Rep. Casey Kozlowski has lost to John Patterson 52.78% to 47.22%.

11:13 p.m.
NBC calls Ohio for Obama. President Obama will be reelected to a second term.

11:10 p.m.
IA called for Obama. Romney now has to run the table to win.

11:02 p.m.
CO, CA, WA, HI called for Obama.
NC, ID, Called for Romney
Too early to call in OR

10:54 p.m.
Sadly, it looks like teachers Donna O'Connor (HD21) and Maureen Reedy (HD24) are going to narrowly lose

10:49 p.m.
MO called for Romney

10:44 p.m.
MN called for Obama

10:36 p.m.
Ohio Supreme Court Justice Yvette McGee Brown trails Sharon Kennedy 43%-57% of the vote, with 54% reporting

10:34 p.m.
As expected, Mitt Romney wins AZ.

10:32 p.m.
Teachers Tanyce Addison (SD26) and Teresa Scarmack (SD-20) are both trailing 40-60, with few precincts left to report.

10:17 p.m.
Ohio state Issues 1 & 2 both going down b y 69% and 64% respectively with 51% of precincts reporting.

10:13 p.m.
As of this time, in the race for the Ohio State Board of Education...
QB Stanley Jackson looks destined for defeat trailing 35-65
Districts 5 & 6 are close
Sarah Fowler, a 23 year old home schooler is going to win in District 7
Pro public education candidates Stephanie Dodd and Mary Rose Oakar are headed to victory
Tood Book, sadly looks destined for defeat.

9:35 p.m.
Another swing state, NH, is called for Obama.

9:26 p.m.
AP Calls Sherrod Brown reelected as Senator from Ohio

First swing state, WI called for Obama

9:15 p.m.
PA called for Obama

Education related, voters in South Dakota so far want to keep teacher tenure. 70 against repealing it, 29% for.

9:03 p.m.
All as expected...
NM, NY, MI are called for Obama.
TX, LA, KS, NE, ND, SD, WY, are called for Romney
AZ, MN, PA too early to call

8:32 p.m.
Teacher Donna O'Connor: 11,558, Duffey (Incumbent) 10,776 in early/absentee voting
Teacher Maureen L. Reedy: 12,082, Stephanie Kunze: 10,535 in early/absentee voting

8:29 p.m.
According to early vote totals Issue 2 is doing very badly. 57 of 88 counties have voted against measure.

8:03 p.m.
DC, DE, RI, ME, CT, MD, MA and IL are called for Obama.
MS, TN, AL, OK are called for Romney
Still too early to call in PA, NJ, MO, OH, NC, VA, FL

7:42 p.m.
Folks are still in line to vote in a number of locations around Ohio, including OSU

7:37 p.m.
SC called for Romney as expected.

7:32 p.m.
As expected so far. CNN calls WV, IN, KY, for Romney. VT for Obama.

A CNN exit poll has Obama 51, Romney 48 in Ohio. Exit poll in NC was 49-49 which was supposed to be Romney +4%

7:30 p.m.
The polls in Ohio are closed, and is being categorized as "too close to call" by NBC.

7:16 p.m.
Here's the times for poll closings:
7:00 pm: GA, IN, KY, SC, VT, VA
7:30 pm: NC, OH, WV
8:00 pm: AL, CT, DE, DC, FL, IL, ME, MD, MA, MS, MO, NH, NJ, OK, PA, RI, TN
8:30 pm: AR
9:00 pm: AZ, CO, KS, LA, MI, MN, NE, NM, NY, ND, SD, TX, WI, WY
10:00 pm: IA, MT, NV, UT
11:00 pm: CA, HI, ID, OR, WA
1:00 am: AK

An AFL poll of Ohio union members has found that SB5 has had a significant effect on union members

Ohio union members are energized and overwhelmingly supporting President Obama and Senator Brown for reelection.

By a 41-point margin, Ohio union members are voting for President Obama (70%) over Mitt Romney (29%) in the presidential race. The early vote among Ohio union members tilts even more heavily in President Obama’s favor (79% to 21%).

Obama’s support among Ohio union members has increased by five percentage points since 2008. Our Election Night and post-election polling in 2008 showed Obama winning 65% of the Ohio union vote, so even accounting for each poll’s margin of error, Obama currently is performing at least as well among Ohio members, if not better, than he did in 2008.

Senator Sherrod Brown also is in a strong position to win Ohio thanks to strong support among the state’s union members, among whom he leads Josh Mandel by 70% to 29%.

According to an NEA poll, 8 out of 10 people had education as a top priority.

The NYT has an interactive tool that will show you who needs what states to win.

Official live results can be seen at the Secretary of States website, here.

Where the polls stand - Post Debate

Almost a week after the first debate, while the race has narrowed marginally, the national and statewide polling continues to show President Obama in a strong position.

In the Electoral College, Real Clear Politics calculates that the President has a lead of 251 (down from 265) votes to Mitt Romney's 181 (down from 191), with 106 in toss-up status.

The NYT polling analyst, 538, shows President Obama projected to win the Electoral College 307.6 - 230.4

In Ohio, the Presidents polling average lead is down from 5.6% to a still healthy 3.0%

This slight softening of polling in Ohio, has President Obama still projected to have a 79.1% chance of prevailing.

With early votiung underway, Boards of Elections are seeing high turnout

COLUMBUS DISPATCH // New Early-Voting Site Has Critics, Fans on First Day

Many people interviewed at Franklin County’s in-person absentee-voting center on opening day yesterday said that uncertainty surrounding the voting hours leading up to Nov. 6 and the change in the early-voting location have disenfranchised voters…

Yesterday, 1,396 people voted. In 2008, the previous presidential election year, 725 showed up on the first day of in-person voting.

TOLEDO BLADE // Turnout For the First Day of Early Voting Nearly Double of that of 2008

The first day of early voting in Lucas County is over, and the turnout was nearly twice that of the first day of early voting in 2008. It was an overwhelmingly Democratic day. Of the 928 voters, 696 were Democrats, 40 were Republicans, and the rest, 192, were members of other parties or were not affiliated with a party. There was a similar balance in favor of Democrats on the first day of early voting in 2008, when President Obama won in Lucas County and Ohio.

DAYTON DAILY NEWS // Voters Turn Up to Cast Ballots Early

Montgomery County had 695 voters while Champaign County had just 88. In Butler County 540 voters cast ballots. Clark County, which has been a battleground for Republicans and Democrats, had a higher first-day voter turnout - 380 - than larger counties like Warren and Greene, which had 282 and 354 respectively.

“I was just surprised; we didn’t have this (turnout) in 2008 that I recall,” said BOE Deputy Director Sally Pickarski. “It’s been fairly steady all day.”

AKRON BEACON JOURNAL // Early Voting Draws Crowd In Summit County

By the end of the day Tuesday, 1,035 people had voted early in Summit County, more than twice the 458 people who cast absentee ballots on the first day of early voting in 2008, the previous presidential election year. About 75 voters had to stand in the rain outside the board Tuesday, waiting their turns.

IndeOnline (Massilon) // Early Voting Doubles in Stark from Four Years Ago

“It’s been busy all morning,” said Mullane, as voters created a buzz outside her office. “In comparison to 2008, in-person early voting has more than doubled.”

CINCINNATI ENQUIRER // Early Voters ‘Making A Statement’

Within the first hour, nearly 100 people voted at the elections board’s Downtown office. By the time the office closed at 5 p.m., the total had risen to 816, about 27 percent higher than 2008’s 644, according to elections board director Amy Searcy.

Meet The Billionaires Who Are Trying To Privatize Our Schools

Via

– Dick DeVos: The DeVos family has been active on education issues since the 1990′s. The son of billionaire Amway co-founder Richard DeVos, Sr., DeVos unsuccessfully ran for governor of the state of Michigan, spending $40 million, the most ever spent in a gubernatorial race in the state. In 2002, Dick DeVos sketched out a plan to undermine public education before the Heritage Foundation, explaining that education advocates should stop using the term “public schools” and instead call them “government schools.” He has poured millions of dollars into right-wing causes, including providing hundreds of thousands of dollars into seed money for numerous “school choice” groups, including Utah’s Parents for Choice in Education, which used its PAC money to elect pro-voucher politicians.

– Betsy DeVos: The wife of Dick DeVos, she also coincidentally happens to be the sister of Erik Prince, the leader of Xe, the mercenary outfit formerly known as Blackwater and is a former chair of the Republican Party of Michigan. Mrs. DeVos has been much more aggressive than her husband, pouring her millions into numerous voucher front groups across the country. She launched the pro-voucher group All Children Matter in 2003, which spent $7.6 million in its first year alone to impact state races related vouchers, winning 121 out of 181 races in which it intervened. All Children Matter was found breaking campaign finance laws in 2008, yet has still not paid its $5.2 million fine. She has founded and/or funded a vast network of voucher front groups, including Children First America, the Alliance for School Choice, Kids Hope USA, and the American Federation for Children.

- American Federation for Children (AFC): AFC made headlines recently when it brought together Govs. Scott Walker (R-WI) and Tom Corbett (R-PA) and former D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee at a major school choice event in Washington, D.C. AFC is perhaps the most prominent of all the current voucher groups, having been founded in January 2010 by Betsy DeVos. Working together with its PAC of the same name and the 501c(3) organization also lead by DeVos, the Alliance for School Choice, it has served as a launching pad for school choice legislation across the country. AFC made its mark in Wisconsin by pouring thousands of dollars into the state legislative races, donating $40,000 in the service of successfully electing voucher advocate Rep. Kathy Bernier (R) and donating similar amounts to elect Reps. Andre Jacque (R), John Klenke (R), Tom Larson (R), Howard Marklein (R), Erik Severson (R), and Travis Tranel (R). DeVos front group All Children Matter also donated thousands to many of these same voucher advocates. Altogether, AFC spent $820,000 in Wisconsin during the last election, making it the 7th-largest single PAC spender during the election (behind several other mostly right-wing groups with similar agendas).

- Alliance for School Choice (ASC): The Alliance for School Choice is another DeVos front group founded to promote vouchers and serves as the education arm of AFC. In 2008, the last date available for its financial disclosures, its total assets amounted to $5,467,064. DeVos used the organization not only for direct spending into propaganda campaigns, but to give grants to organizations with benign-sounding names so that they could push the radical school choice agenda. For example, in 2008 the organization gave $530,000 grant to the “Black Alliance for Educational Options” in Washington, D.C. and a $433,736 grant to the “Florida School Choice Fund.” This allowed DeVos to promote her causes without necessarily revealing her role. But it isn’t just the DeVos family that’s siphoning money into the Alliance for School Choice and its many front group patrons. Among its other wealthy funders include the Jaquelin Hume Foundation (which gave $75,000 in 2008 and $100,000 in 2006), the brainchild of one of an ultra-wealthy California businessman who brought Ronald Reagan to power, the powerful Wal Mart Foundation (which gave $100,000 in 2005, the Chase Foundation of Virginia (which gave $9,000 in 2007, 2008, and the same amount in 2009), which funds over “supports fifty nonprofit libertarian/conservative public policy research organizations,” and hosts investment banker Derwood Chase, Jr. as a trustee, the infamous oil billionaire-driven Charles Koch Foundation ($10,000 in 2005), and the powerful Wal Mart family’s Walton Family Foundation (more than $3 million over 2004-2005).

- Bill and Susan Oberndorf: This Oberndorfs use their fortune, gained from Bill’s position as the managing director of the investment firm SPO Partners, to funnel money to a wide variety of school choice and corporate education reform groups. In 2009, their Bill and Susan Oberndorf Foundation gave $376,793 to AFC, $5,000 to the Center for Education Reform, and $50,000 to the Brighter Choice Foundation. Additionally, Bill Oberndorf gave half a million dollars to the school choice front group All Children Matter between 2005 and 2007. At a recent education panel, Bill Oberndorf was credited with giving “tens of millions” of dollars of his personal wealth to the school choice movement, and said that the passage of the Indiana voucher law was the “gold standard” for what should be done across America.

- The Walton Family Foundation (WFF):The Wal Mart-backed WFF is one of the most powerful foundations in the country, having made investments in 2009 totaling over $378 million. In addition to financing a number of privately-managed charter schools itself, the foundation showered ASC with millions of dollars in 2009. It also gave over a million dollars to the New York-based Brighter Choice Foundation, half a million dollars to the Florida School Choice Fund, $105,000 to the Foundation for Educational Choice, $774,512 to the Friends of Educational Choice, $400,000 to School Choice Ohio, and gave $50,000 to the Piton Foundation to promote a media campaign around the Colorado School Choice website — all in 2009 alone. WFF’s push for expanding private school education and undermining traditional public schools was best summed up by John Walton’s words in an interview in 2000. An interviewer asked him, “Do you think there’s money to be made in education?” Walton replied, “Absolutely. I think it will offer a reasonable return for investors.” (He also did vigorously argue in the same interview that he does not want to abolish public education).

Why Levy requests are down

Gongwer reports

Fewer than normal school and library issues will appear on the March primary ballot and advocates suspect the cause was confusion surrounding when Ohio would hold the election.

A partisan dispute over the drawing of new congressional district maps had Ohioans for a time scheduled to vote in two primary elections before a compromise map established a single Mar. 6 primary date. (See Gongwer Ohio Report, December 14, 2011)

Among the 465 issues appearing on the March 6 ballot are nine bond issues, 280 tax requests, 124 local liquor options, nine combination questions and 43 miscellaneous issues, according the secretary of state.

Schools as usual make up the brunt of issues with seven bond requests, 85 tax levies, seven combination bond-tax issues, two combination income tax-bond issues, and 11 tax changes, according to the SOS.

The number of school levies is down, however, from the last presidential primary election, Ohio School Boards Association Director of Legislative Services Damon Asbury said. Whereas Ohio's 2008 primary saw 191 issues, only 112 funding requests are up this year.

"I think the numbers this year at least for this March primary may be a little lower just because of the confusion that districts were experiencing back in November, December when it wasn't clear whether we were going to have a March primary or a May primary."

The more likely explanation is that fact that the Republican presidential primary is contested and will attract lots of conservative voters who typically do not support school funding issues.

We published a full list of the school levy issues that will appear on the March 6th primary ballots, here.

SB5 is very harmful to new teachers

When the supporters of SB5 talk about the teaching provisions, they use an ugly, divisive argument. The argument is mean to pit teacher against teacher, young vs old, like this example from "Better Ohio"

Or this from an extreme right wing blogger

It's an ugly argument, full of falsehoods on a number of levels, for a number of reasons. They not too subtly imply that because of seniority, young teacher get laid off - and that it's these young teachers that are "the best".

This should offend any veteran educator, in no other profession is experience denigrated or misrepresented in this manner.

The very best teachers in Ohio have some of the deepest and longest experience. Consider Ohio's teachers of the year

Tim Dove, 2011 Ohio Teacher of the Year - 29 years experience
Natalie Wester, 2010 Ohio Teacher of the Year - 7 years experience
Jennifer Walker, 2009 Ohio Teacher of the Year - over 14 years experience
Deborah Wickerham, 2008 Ohio Teacher of the Year - over 33 years experience
George Edge, 2007 Ohio Teacher of the Year - over 28 years experience
Eric Combs, 2006 Ohio Teacher of the Year - over 20 years experience
Deepa Ganschinietz, 2005 Ohio Teacher of the Year - over 20 years experience
Kathy Rank, 2004 Ohio Teacher of the Year - over 20 years experience
Doreen Uhas-Sauer, 2003 Ohio Teacher of the Year - over 35 years experience

The argument is particularly ugly because no one wants to argue that there are some fine young teachers, but all the evidence in the world indicates that if SB5 passes it is young teachers, not more experienced teachers, who would suffer to the greatest extent.

First, teaching is an incredibly hard, complex job, requiring lots of skill, practice and experience. This is one of the primary reasons why it is estimated that almost a third of America’s teachers leave the field sometime during their first three years of teaching, and almost half leave after five years (National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education). If we were to rely predominantly on young teachers our schools would experience significant shortages and very distruptive turnover.

Moreover, study after study shows that teachers become more skilled with experience (see Rice, 2003; Murnane, 1975; Murnane & Phillips, 1981; Ferguson, 1991; Ferguson & Ladd, 1996; Greenwald, Hedges, & Laine, 1996; Hanushek, Kain, & Rivkin, 1998; Grissmer, Flanagan, Kawata, & Williamson, 2000; Rivers & Sanders, 2002; Rowan et al., 2002; Wayne & Youngs, 2003; Nye, Konstantopoulos, & Hedges, 2004; Hanushek & Rivkin, 2004; Hanushek, Kain, O’Brien, & Rivkin, 2005; Kane, Rockoff, & Staiger, 2006; Gordon, Kane, & Staiger, 2006; Harris & Sass, 2007; Aos, Miller, & Pennucci, 2007; Clotfelter, Ladd, & Vigdor, 2006, 2007a).

If teachers are to be evlauated, paid, hired and fired based on their performance, it is unlikely that most new, inexperienced teachers are going to benefit from this rubric when compared to their more experienced colleagues. Indeed, in the absence of preferential treatment or compensation level based decisions that seniority protects against, younger teachers should expect to be let go more often, not less. See their pay grow slower and not faster

How many people would want to enter such a profession?

To be explicit. If SB5 were to become law, young teachers entering the classroom would be harmed significantly by it.

Supporters of SB5 are not interested in rewarding the best teacher, or any teachers. If they were they would have included money in the bill, or the budget, to provide that reward. Instead they made unprecedented cuts to public education.

White Hat Management Political Contributions

Plunderbund has an article detailing the failings of White Hat Management as a charter school management company, and in light of the news of the GOP plan to privatize public education, the political crosswinds that created the plan

The goal of this budget seems pretty obvious. White Hat has a problem with their schools and boards and sponsors so the legislature just removes them from the picture, allowing White Hat to drirectly start up schools as for-profit companies, eliminating the hassle of oversight. White Hat has a problem with people questioning how they use public funds provided by the state, so the legislature just makes those funds private as soon as they are delivered to White Hat.

Some of the language in this budget is so specifically directly at helping White Hat that it wouldn’t surprise me at all if Brennan’s lawyers write it themselves. Whether it’s true or not, Ohio’s GOP politicians appear to be paying back one of their largest campaign donors with millions of state dollars while completely disregarding the educational needs of thousands of Ohio’s students.

The whole article is worth a read.

Just to highlight the scope of Brennan's political largese, here is a list of the almost $1.6 million in political campaign contributions made by some of the main players involved with White Hat Management since 2000.

Cycle	Amount	Contributor Name	Recipient Name
2010	$50,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - EXECUTIVE CMTE
2010	$50,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - EXECUTIVE CMTE
2010	$30,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - STATE CANDIDATE FUND
2010	$30,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - STATE CANDIDATE FUND
2010	$30,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - STATE CANDIDATE FUND
2010	$25,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - EXECUTIVE CMTE
2010	$25,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - EXECUTIVE CMTE
2010	$17,075	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN CMTE OF OHIO
2010	$17,075	BRENNAN, DAVID L	REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN CMTE OF OHIO
2010	$17,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO HOUSE REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN CMTE
2010	$17,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN CMTE OF OHIO
2010	$17,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN CMTE OF OHIO
2010	$17,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO HOUSE REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN CMTE
2010	$11,396	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	MANDEL, JOSH
2010	$11,396	BRENNAN, DAVID L	KASICH, JOHN & TAYLOR, MARY
2010	$11,395	BRENNAN, DAVID L	KASICH, JOHN & TAYLOR, MARY
2010	$11,395	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	HUSTED, JON
2010	$11,395	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	KASICH, JOHN & TAYLOR, MARY
2010	$11,350	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	WAGONER, MARK
2010	$11,350	BRENNAN, DAVID L	NIEHAUS, TOM
2010	$11,350	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	FABER, KEITH
2010	$11,350	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	NIEHAUS, TOM
2010	$11,300	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	HUSTED, JON
2010	$11,300	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	MANDEL, JOSH
2010	$11,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	DEWINE, MIKE
2010	$11,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	MORGAN, SETH
2010	$11,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	BATCHELDER, WILLIAM G
2010	$11,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	BATCHELDER, WILLIAM G
2010	$11,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	AMSTUTZ, RON
2010	$11,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	HUFFMAN, MATT
2010	$11,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	BATCHELDER, WILLIAM G
2010	$11,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	AMSTUTZ, RON
2010	$6,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	YOST, DAVID A
2010	$5,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	BACON, KEVIN
2010	$5,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	YOST, DAVID A
2010	$4,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - STATE CANDIDATE FUND
2010	$3,125	MANNA, ANTHONY	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - STATE CANDIDATE FUND
2010	$250	WEBER III, JOSEPH R	MANDEL, JOSH
2010	$250	RICE, MARK A	MANDEL, JOSH
2010	$250	MESSER JR, QUENTIN	MANDEL, JOSH
2010	$250	WEBER III, JOSEPH R	LAROSE, FRANK
2010	$100	MESSER JR, QUENTIN	HUSTED, JON
2008	$100,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - EXECUTIVE CMTE
2008	$100,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - EXECUTIVE CMTE
2008	$100,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - EXECUTIVE CMTE
2008	$100,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - EXECUTIVE CMTE
2008	$50,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - EXECUTIVE CMTE
2008	$50,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - EXECUTIVE CMTE
2008	$30,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY - STATE CANDIDATE FUND
2008	$25,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L MR	Republican National Cmte
2008	$16,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN CMTE OF OHIO
2008	$16,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN CMTE OF OHIO
2008	$16,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN CMTE OF OHIO
2008	$16,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN CMTE OF OHIO
2008	$15,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO HOUSE REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN CMTE
2008	$12,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	OHIO HOUSE REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN CMTE
2008	$10,650	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	HARRIS, BILL
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	BACON, KEVIN
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	TAYLOR, MARY
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	TAYLOR, MARY
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	BATCHELDER, WILLIAM
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	BATCHELDER, WILLIAM
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	BATCHELDER, WILLIAM
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	COLEY, BILL
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	DOLAN, MATTHEW
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	HOTTINGER, JAY
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	DOLAN, MATTHEW
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	HUSTED, JON
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	PATTON, THOMAS
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	NIEHAUS, TOM
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	CAREY JR, JOHN A
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	HUSTED, JON
2008	$10,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	JONES, SHANNON
2008	$5,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	HITE, CLIFFORD
2008	$5,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	GINTER, TIM
2008	$5,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	HOTTINGER, JAY
2008	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	SCHLICHTER, JOHN
2008	$2,300	HARRISON, E D MS	George V Voinovich (R)
2008	$2,300	BRENNAN, ANN	Lamar Alexander (R)
2008	$2,300	BRENNAN, DAVID	Lamar Alexander (R)
2008	$2,300	BRENNEN, NANCY J	George V Voinovich (R)
2008	$2,300	BRENNAN, DAVID L	James D Jordan (R)
2008	$1,300	BRENNAN, DAVID L	George V Voinovich (R)
2008	$1,000	HARRISON, E D MS	George V Voinovich (R)
2008	$1,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	George V Voinovich (R)
2008	$1,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	TIFFANY, TOM
2008	$1,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	DARLING, ALBERTA
2008	$1,000	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	COUGHLIN, KEVIN
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	EGELHOFF, JO
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	HUSTED, JON
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	DAVIS, BRETT
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	PETROWSKI, JERRY J
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	MURSAU, JEFFREY L
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	NERISON, LEE
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	HINES, J A
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	HELLMAN, DAN
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	NERISON, LEE
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	HONADEL, MARK
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	TOWNS, DEBI
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	RIPP, KEITH
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	VAN ROY, KARL
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	FRISKE, DON
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	MURTHA, JOHN
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	WILLIAMS, MARY
2008	$500	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	DOCKERY, PAULA
2008	$400	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	HUEBSCH, MIKE
2008	$200	BRENNAN, DAVID L	George V Voinovich (R)
2008	$200	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	VOS, ROBIN J
2008	$200	BRENNAN, ANN AMER	COLE, RANDY
2006	$15,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	REPUBLICAN SENATE CAMPAIGN CMTE OF OHIO
2006	$10,000	BRENNAN, ANN	GREEN, MARK A (G)
2006	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	CAREY JR, JOHN A
2006	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	TAYLOR, MARY
2006	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	HUSTED, JON
2006	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVE	GREEN, MARK A (G)
2006	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	PETERSON, JON
2006	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	HARTMANN, GREG
2006	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	BRADLEY, JENNETTE B
2006	$10,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	LYNCH, DAVID
2006	$7,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	CAREY JR, JOHN A
2006	$5,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	TAYLOR, MARY
2006	$5,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	SEITZ, BILL
2006	$4,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	PETERSON, JON
2006	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	LUTHER, BRANT
2006	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	BACON, KEVIN
2006	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	MARTIN, EARL J
2006	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	STIVERS, STEVE
2006	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	CATES, GARY
2006	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	NIEHAUS, TOM
2006	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	HOPPEL, JIM
2006	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	STIVERS, STEVE
2006	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	HAYES, WILLIAM C
2006	$2,100	BRENNAN, DAVID L	Craig Foltin (R)
2006	$2,100	BRENNAN, DAVID L	Craig Foltin (R)
2006	$2,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	PATTON, THOMAS F
2006	$2,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	MARTIN, EARL J
2006	$2,000	BRENNAN, DAVID L	WEBSTER, SHAWN N
2004	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	HAGAN, JOHN P
2004	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	SETZER, ARLENE J
2004	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	CALVERT, CHARLES E
2004	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	NIEHAUS, TOM
2004	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	CATES, GARY
2004	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	PADGETT, JOY
2004	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	PETRO, JIM
2004	$2,000	BRENNAN, NANCY J MRS	George W Bush (R)
2004	$2,000	BRENNAN, ANN A MRS	George W Bush (R)
2004	$1,000	BRENNAN, NANCY	Steven C LaTourette (R)
2004	$1,000	BRENNAN, NANCY	Mike DeWine (R)
2004	$1,000	BRENNAN, NANCY	Bill McCollum (R)
2004	$1,000	KROHN, MARK E MR	George W Bush (R)
2004	$1,000	MORRIS, JOHN C MR	George W Bush (R)
2004	$1,000	BRENNAN, NANCY J	George V Voinovich (R)
2004	$1,000	BRENNAN, NANCY J	George V Voinovich (R)
2004	$500	BRENNAN, DAVID	SPADY, FAWN
2002	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	RAUSSEN, JAMES
2002	$2,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	RAUSSEN, JAMES
2002	$1,000	BRENNAN, NANCY J	George V Voinovich (R)
2002	$1,000	BRENNAN, NANCY	Mike DeWine (R)
2000	$1,500	BRENNAN, DAVID L	GARDNER, RANDALL
2000	$1,000	BRENNAN, NANCY J	George V Voinovich (R)

Data taken from www.transparencydata.com.